Sweepstakes Casino Controversy – And Celebrities’ All-important Role

The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday’s hearing on prohibited gaming.

No, they weren’t personally in participation, but the world-famous celebrities were conspicuously included in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes casinos – the questionable websites offering both complimentary casino-style video games and lucrative prizes, such as money, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can ‘play for totally free,’ while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are simply 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now finds itself besieged by lawsuits. In the eyes of numerous gaming corporations, not to discuss lawsuit complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments function as conventional casinos, only without the oversight, consumer defenses and tax laws. So not just can they prevent the steep 24-percent federal sports betting levy, however sweepstakes operators aren’t subject to regulatory obstacles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming protections.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in profits last year alone. Now the business faces accusations of prohibited sports betting in a New York claim that declares VGW uses celeb endorsers to ‘produce a veneer of authenticity’ around its product. (See VGW’s declaration below)

‘I’m unsure” if you do not trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton” is a winning message for business running multibillion-dollar prohibited operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,’ Friday’s presenter, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers include a variety of celebs from gambling lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George – none of whom use any distinctions between traditional gambling and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among many sweepstakes gambling establishments discovered online

Ryan Seacrest to dip into Chumba Casino, where lots of – but not all – video games are totally free

Drake has a handle social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he regularly touts on social media

Learn more

Donald Trump ‘set to call NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy’

Instead, ads typically focus around the social aspect of the casinos, while omitting the potential for actual sports betting losses.

Others tempt customers with promises of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks ad revealing off Drake’s vehicles, planes and mansions before rotating to video of the rap artist playing online casino-style video games.

‘Daddy, why do we have a lot money?’ check out the first caption on the screen.

Another caption explained: ‘Because I never quit.’

The discrepancy between gaming websites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit complex, but operators of the latter insist they’re not involved with the previous.

A representative for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), explained its members are not in direct competitors with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, most of the gamers on social-sweepstakes casinos are sports betting free.

‘Most social sweeps customers never ever purchase,’ the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. ‘The minority of consumers who make purchases do so in amounts far smaller than the typical deposit or wager size at real-money online gaming websites.’

Social casinos offer clients an opportunity to play casino-style games with friends. Players have the option to purchase valueless currency typically referred to as ‘gold coins,’ which can not be exchanged for genuine money, however can be utilized to open different functions within the games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes gaming, allowing clients to obtain other currency referred to as ‘sweeps coins’ that can be exchanged for money or other prizes.

And therein lies the capacity for monetary losses, like the ones claimed by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One gamer told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the previous year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of money and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers’ Paul George is seen promoting an International Poker event

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an advertisement displaying Drake’s vehicles, aircrafts and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW’s Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are banned in all however 7 states, which has helped to fuel the appeal of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes sites, which don’t need usually need recognition. However, sites like Chumba will request IDs from gamers trying to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, allow clients to send mail-in ask for totally free sweeps coins, offered the gamers follow painfully particular instructions. What’s more, gamers are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins simply for signing up, consequently providing a reason to attempt their hands at any variety of gambling establishment video games for an opportunity to win – or lose – genuine cash.

So why are sweepstakes websites enabled to operate in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are prohibited in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the totally free casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competition is just a method of promoting their bread and butter.

‘Social sweepstakes video games are merely a form of online entertainment,’ an SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com by email. ‘No purchase is required to play at social gambling establishments with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never ever need to spend for an opportunity to win prizes. That lack of a purchase requirement – or” factor to consider” – is a vital distinction between social sweeps and standard online sports betting sites like gambling establishments.’

Consider the manner in which McDonald’s utilizes its yearly Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren’t paying to bet, but rather they’re buying hamburgers and fries that use them the possibility to win financially rewarding rewards, such as a $1 million prize.

And without a purchase requirement, or ‘factor to consider’, the game itself does not fulfill the definition of sports betting in the US.

‘Sweepstakes are an enduring technique for promoting all type of daily services in the United States, whatever from hamburgers to magazine subscriptions to coffee and home improvement shops,’ the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. ‘Sweepstakes promotions are routinely used by a who’s who of home names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.’

But to many sports betting industry experts, that argument does not cut it.

For starters, video gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach mentions, McDonald’s Monopoly game doesn’t run forever. Rather, it has a distinct start and end, therefore suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant’s primary item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote genuine items like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

‘They do not last permanently and they’re generally not connected to casino-style video games of possibility,’ Wallach informed DailyMail.com. ‘They’re simply money free gifts.

‘The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] possess none of the characteristics commonly associated with McDonald’s-style sweepstakes promos,’ Wallach continued. ‘Besides running in all time, the sweepstakes casinos provide” casino-like” payouts, usually 80 percent or more of incomes, whereas the common payout percentage for a momentary advertising sweepstakes is a trivial share of the income made by the business [generally less than one percent]’

Wallach fasts to compare the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the web cafes that sprang up in Florida, offering customers the chance to play casino-style video games for real prizes. A number of those brick-and-mortar facilities have because been shuttered over accusations of unlawful sports betting.

DJ Khaled is amongst a number of celeb spokespeople for VGW’s Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments must face similar analysis.

‘These differences are not approximate,’ Wallach said of social sweeps casinos. ‘They have actually repeatedly been cited by courts and state chief law officer as essential consider determining that a sweepstakes promotion remained in reality a guise for illegal sports betting.’

One of the gambling establishment industry’s leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing legislators to investigate sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact new legislation on the issue.

‘Consumers are being denied of defenses and states are passing up considerable tax and revenue chances as this gambling changes that performed through controlled channels,’ checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.

And then there are the complainants who have actually sued social gambling establishments in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 separate cases in Kentucky without admitting any misbehavior, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW consented to pay $11.75 million in one class-action claim, stating the settlement was made to prevent legal expenses and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has actually signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the most recent suit, which is mainly similar to its predecessors, New York state homeowners Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an ‘prohibited gaming business. ‘

Apple and Google have likewise been called as offenders in claims for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com’s ask for comment.

‘We generally do not comment on matters before the courts,’ a VGW representative informed DailyMail.com by means of e-mail. ‘However, we keep in mind that this claim has actually only just been submitted with the court and VGW has actually not been officially served.

‘We have complete confidence in our compliance with all laws and guidelines where we run, and remain confident about the future,’ the spokesperson continued. ‘We continue to offer our free-to-play video games across most of North America, as we have for more than a decade, developing not just excellent games, user experiences and home entertainment, but likewise guaranteeing this is done securely, properly and at the highest level of standards.

‘More broadly, we ‘d reiterate that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are fairly typical across the online social video games industry (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we mean to vigorously protect any claim which may be brought versus us.’

The concerns between traditional online gambling and sweepstakes gambling establishments could prove bothersome for some celebrity endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers’ George both endorse VGW’s Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with conventional video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

‘It’s paradoxical that expert athletes are hawking illegal sports betting wagering ‘sweeps’ sites while at the same time the leagues wish to forecast a strong position against unlawful gambling – particularly when trying to tamp down the occasional sports betting scandal,’ Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was just eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a lifetime restriction from the NBA over allegations he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter’s scandal is unrelated to anything including social or sweepstakes casinos.

Along with VGW, Apple and Google are being sued for hosting apparently unlawful sports betting sites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a major issue for leagues such as the NBA.

‘I ‘d anticipate that a league crackdown on professional athletes backing sweepstakes websites is a matter of when, not if,’ Glaser added.

Neither an NBA spokesman nor the players’ agents reacted to DailyMail.com’s requests for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise neglected to respond to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their celeb endorsers have a duty to explain to consumers the distinctions and resemblances in between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW firmly insisted there is absolutely nothing more that needs to be done.

‘We have full confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our business practices more broadly,’ the spokesperson said. ‘A few of our values are” our players precede” and” we do what’s right”, and we put our values at the core of everything we do.’

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes websites, sees things in a different way.

‘Celebrities who provide their names to shady unlawful sports betting sites are, at a minimum, putting their credibilities at danger as well as courting civil and class actions by consumers who allege harm,’ Glaser stated. ‘There is likewise some threat that state regulators and state attorney generals of the United States rope star endorsers into enforcement efforts for helping with illegal gaming.’

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton